0
0
Greater Noida: In the Mathura case, a civil suit was filed in 1964 by a local Hindu organization seeking possession of the land on which the mosque stands, and the restoration of the Krishna Janmasthan Temple. The suit was dismissed by the trial court in 1968, and the decision was upheld by the Allahabad High Court in 1992.
In 2017, another suit was filed in the Mathura district court by a local lawyer, seeking the removal of the mosque and the restoration of the temple at the site. The suit was based on the grounds that the mosque was built on the site of a pre-existing temple, and therefore the mosque was illegally constructed.
The case is currently pending before the Mathura district court. The petitioner has argued that the mosque was built by destroying a Hindu temple, and that the mosque should be removed and the temple restored. The defendant, the Shahi Masjid Committee, has argued that the mosque has been in existence for over 350 years, and that the suit is time-barred under theIn 2017, another suit was filed in the Mathura district court by a local lawyer, seeking the removal of the mosque and the restoration of the temple at the site. The suit was based on the grounds that the mosque was built on the site of a pre-existing temple, and therefore the mosque was illegally constructed.
Limitation Act:
The case is currently pending before the Mathura district court. The petitioner has argued that the mosque was built by destroying a Hindu temple, and that the mosque should be removed and the temple restored. The defendant, the Shahi Masjid Committee, has argued that the mosque has been in existence for over 350 years, and that the suit is time-barred under the Limitation Act.
The case is currently pending before the Mathura district court. The petitioner has argued that the mosque was built by demolishing a Hindu temple, and the mosque should be removed and the temple restored. The defendant, the Shahi Masjid Committee, has argued that the mosque has existed for more than 350 years, and that the suit is time-barred under the Limitation Act.
